<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pagination #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tyeshasnow.com/2009/03/19/pagination-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tyeshasnow.com/2009/03/19/pagination-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyesha</title>
		<link>http://www.tyeshasnow.com/2009/03/19/pagination-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>tyesha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tyeshasnow.com/?p=25#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Good idea Steve. I think visually it looks nice all the same size but functionally so that could be an improvement. it&#039;s always a balance right?  I&#039;ll do another post on this soon.  send me any you find!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea Steve. I think visually it looks nice all the same size but functionally so that could be an improvement. it&#8217;s always a balance right?  I&#8217;ll do another post on this soon.  send me any you find!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Moseley</title>
		<link>http://www.tyeshasnow.com/2009/03/19/pagination-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Moseley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tyeshasnow.com/?p=25#comment-6</guid>
		<description>That is a much better example.  I know the circles are small already, but I wonder if making the &quot;1st&quot; and &quot;last&quot; links slightly smaller would emphasize the &quot;next&quot; and &quot;previous&quot; buttons more?  Just a thought.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Would to to hear if you come up with anymore thoughts on this.  As it stands, pagination isn&#039;t very user-friendly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a much better example.  I know the circles are small already, but I wonder if making the &#8220;1st&#8221; and &#8220;last&#8221; links slightly smaller would emphasize the &#8220;next&#8221; and &#8220;previous&#8221; buttons more?  Just a thought.</p>
<p>Would to to hear if you come up with anymore thoughts on this.  As it stands, pagination isn&#8217;t very user-friendly.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonrobb.mp</title>
		<link>http://www.tyeshasnow.com/2009/03/19/pagination-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonrobb.mp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tyeshasnow.com/?p=25#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Great idea! I wholly support your quest for better pagination.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Keep exposing those bad practices so we can learn and understand when is the appropriate time to use which implementation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for sharing! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! I wholly support your quest for better pagination.</p>
<p>Keep exposing those bad practices so we can learn and understand when is the appropriate time to use which implementation.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

